Thursday, January 19, 2012

New Zealand chronicle

As they often do, my thoughts today turn consistently to New Zealand. As a means of unpacking all that I experienced, I thought I would do a series of chronological posts, starting with my arrival in Auckland on March 1st 2010.


I set off from High Bentham train station at about 9:30 in the morning and spent the day in London (Feb 27th). I changed about £800 of cash into NZ$ at what eventually turned out to be an excellent exchange rate (near enough $2.2 to the £), before going to a cheapo Travelodge for the night booked right next to Heathrow. Rather embarrassingly I managed to get lost on the way there, having only some poor, briefly scrawled directions on a scrap of paper to guide me in the dark. I had to resort to ringing my dad and he guided me there sitting at the computer using Google Earth. Not a particularly auspicious start to the journey! My feet were killing me, having spent hours walking about in the dark so I went to bed early and woke up about 4am and set off for the airport. I believe my flight was around 9 but can't really remember. Check in went smoothly, and I treated myself to an overpriced Full English before I boarded.



The flight itself was 24 hours long, with 3 stops; one in Dubai, one in Brunei and finally one in Australia somewhere, I can't remember where. Technically due to the +12 hour time difference it was a 36 hour flight. Its certainly one of the longest flights you can take in the world, and it really was so dull. I watched all the usual in flight movies and TV series on the build in screens but they only entertain for so long. It was dark when we stopped in Dubai so I don't remember it, Brunei was SO humid, even walking to the terminal and back bought me out in a sweat. All the windows were dripping with water! 



Eventually we touched down at Auckland International Airport, built a couple of miles out from the city proper. It was about 3am when we landed, and the first thing I remember was the freshness of the air, it was like a fresh sea breeze magnified many times. It took many days to get used to it, for whatever reason (presumably far fewer people) the air is much cleaner over there. I managed to find a minibus service delivering people to central Auckland for $30. It was still dark, and I couldn't book into my hostel until 10am so I wondered around central Auckland for a while eventually tiring and finding a seat in a near empty plaza. 


It was then that it hit me: I was on the other side of the world! I didn't know anyone here. It was very exciting! I had arrived with no plans at all (other than 2 nights booked in a hostel) and no real experience of foreign travel. If I could go back in time to any moment it would be this one with everything stretching out before me. Finally 10am arrived and I chucked my extremely heavy rucksack in my 16 person dorm room before striding out into the city to attempt to plan something resembling a holiday. 

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

2012!

I do like the end of the calendar year as its a chance to take stock. Was unable to think about it in great depth before as my girlfriend was up in Leeds over the New Year, who was often being sick ¬_¬ live and learn springs to mind!

This year will contain far more uncertainties than 2011, as this is the year that I graduate. I hand in my dissertation in September and then the ceremony itself it mid-December, so at the very least its a while off. This big uncertainty is what I will do afterwards, as the jobs situation is, and will remain, awful for quite some time. Thankfully my situation is a fair distance away from a lot of graduates, but not by much! Bottom line is I have no idea what my situation will be in 12 months time, there is a good chance I won't be able to find work. I'm pretty picky when it comes to jobs, and I make no apologies for that. There are whole swaths of jobs now that I won't even consider. I know some postgraduates who do not feel the same but I cannot relate. Being unemployed really isn't so bad! Always important to bear in mind that there is only so much you can do, you are not immune from broad economic trends. The remnants of the welfare state will at least not leave me completely out to dry. I just don't feel like I have the energy anymore to lie and bullshit my way through a whole load of graduate selection programs, they really do suck. After several years of intellectual honesty and exciting discovery its not a pleasant feeling to sink into the nasty world of job applications doublespeak and general awfulness. Anyway that’s a while off yet...

The real obstacle to overcome this year is my dissertation! If its a good one a distinction beckons, if not that I shall have to make do with a respectable merit. At this stage it could go either way! I am thinking of making some pretty big changes to my research based on feedback from the conference, I have a research proposal to submit in week 7 of this semester. The real work will be done over the summer, but by then I need to know precisely what it is I need to be doing! 

I am looking forward to my last remaining taught module on late Imperial European history. The precise title escapes me for the moment, and I has been hoping to pursue a military module but no doubt I will be able to read up on military issues regardless. The module coordinator is also my dissertation supervisor, so it should prove easy enough to do a couple of military essays. It will be a strange feeling finishing the module, as that effectively ends my taught education that began in primary school! After this point there is no more teaching that can be done, you are on your own. Although perhaps I will opt to do another taught MA in the future so maybe not!

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

End of 2011

I have finally done my Hist5000 paper, the conference was very stressful and I'm just glad its over! Rachel was there to support me, she sat through so many papers and didn't pass out due to boredom. Some of the Race and Resistance papers were truly dull in the extreme so she deserves a mighty pat on the back! We had a KFC bucket to celebrate, good times :-) A girl who appreciates food as much as I do is to be cherished!
I am glad Christmas is nearly here, I do feel tired of my course. If I could go back in time perhaps I would study politics instead. Then again maybe I wouldn't. All I have left now are one optional module and the dissertation itself, as well as a research proposal but I'm not sure what that involves. 


I am not sure what to buy family for Christmas, no doubt I will choose some books again. Waterstones often have a 3 for 2 book offer on, so perhaps I will take advantage of that. 

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Carol Concerts and Me

Leeds University Union is tomorrow the host of a particularly early carol concert on December 1st, put on as a joint spectacle by Christian Unions from both the University of Leeds and the Leeds Met. The early date is presumably assure the largest possible student audience as students will soon be drifting off back home. Engaging with an increasingly recalcitrant and stratified student population is becoming increasingly difficult at the best of times, so I can't say I blame the CU's for striking while the iron is still somewhat luke-warm.

Normally I attend as I enjoy the sense of nostalgia from previous enforced attendance at numerous childhood carol concerts accompanied by some tedious acting role in a nativity play, as well as presenting me with the opportunity to snaffle half a dozen free mince pies. I am particularly prone to bouts of nostalgia (no doubt linked in some way to my love of history) so despite knowing better I feel pulled into attending. Of course this shared communal nostalgia is exactly what the CU's are hoping to cash in on, for them this is the grand daddy of evangelical events, a once a year opportunity to present the saving Gospel of their Lord Jesus Christ to as many unbelievers as possible. Easter just does not compare for getting bums on seats! The contract we (non-Christians) all sign when we attend these events is implicit rather than explicit: we get some free refreshments and get so sing all the old favourites, and in return you have to sit there and listen to a roughly half hour evangelical message. Being an enormous sucker, I am still willing to make this deal.

This year's event holds particular interest to me as part way through the evening's 'entertainment' is a talk about the Christmas message by none other than Amy Orr-Ewing. Having a particular interest in evangelical Christianity (largely under the classical Sun-Tzu principle of knowing one's enemy) I am well aware that Amy ranks probably among the best and brightest of all UK evangelicals concerned directly with higher levels of Christian apologia, receiving a first class degree in Theology at Christ Church, Oxford and an MA in theology from King's College before turning her hand to professional writing. I have spent many an hour listening to her talks and presentations online and am rather shamefully excited to see her 'live'. Perhaps this will be a chance to cross swords with a genuine Christian intellect? Sadly, I will probably just stuff some mince pies into my scruffy rucksack and shuffle out of the back entrance once the festivities are over, as I don't think my philosophy of religion is quite in her league.

Friday, November 25, 2011

Abstract/Synopsis

One common feature of academic work is the placement of an 'abstract' at the beginning of a substantial piece of research. In tends not to be too common in academic history although I've grown to think of it as an excellent idea. As part of 'thinking through' all the issues associated with my dissertation I thought it might be worthwhile to attempt writing one for my own piece of work. Given that the topic is on:

'Operational Strategy and Tactics at the Battle of the Somme'

this is my initial attempt at an abstract/synopsis:

'This work will examine the historical literature that deals with the battle of the Somme concerning operational strategy and tactics. In addition to outlining the arguments of key works that have touched on this topic I will be attempting to assess the causes behind the many changes that have taken place from 1918 to the present day (2012). In particular, I will be focusing on what strategic principles or lessons those dealing with the Somme have attempted to take from the events of 1916, and how they too changed over time. The impact of both the professionalisation of British academic history as well as the wider intellectual challenges to historical study will also be addressed through this study.'

Ok that will do for now. I am not at all happy with it, perhaps I will mull it over further in the gym and come back and edit it into oblivion.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Dissertation Focus

In a few weeks time I have to present a paper, outlining my research proposal for my dissertation due next September. As a means of support I have enlisted my girlfriend to come 'observe' me, hopefully this will not backfire! The format is 15-20 minutes presenting your paper in a format of your choice (although handouts and/or PowerPoint are strongly recommended).

I was originally meant to be doing a course in military history here at Leeds but that course was binned, a fate that is symptomatic for military history more broadly in the UK. Nonetheless, this can be compensated for by a military focused dissertation and having acquired the necessary supervisionary expertise I am thankfully able to start one! My topic is on the Great War, more specifically on the British Army and operational strategy and tactics on the Western Front. Yet I am not attempting to conduct a 15,000 word piece of original research (as is normally the case) but am instead going to attempt a historiographical work. Yet the literature on this topic is simply too big to cover adequately for a mere dissertation, so I needed a way to narrow this topic down. This can be done in one of three ways:

Firstly, I could find some way to narrow the time-scale of the historiography in question, for instance, choosing to focus solely on the relevant literature from 1919-1939. I am not a fan of this approach, as any late start date or early end point seems somewhat arbitrary to me. Historiography rarely divides into neat and tidy epochs fit for critical discussion.

Secondly, there is the option of narrowing the focus on to a particular battle of campaign, however most battles have made little significant impact and so in effect I would be limited to probably either the battle of the Somme in 1916, or 3rd Ypres in 1917 (otherwise known as Passchendaele). Cambrai was an option I considered, but there didn't seem to be the required level of historical reading to support it.

The third, and final, option was to consider a relevant historical figure and assess their impact on strategy and tactics of the Great War. As with the former option, this is not as big a choice as might appear as when considering the British Army there is only really the character of Douglas Haig, not even his immediate operational subordinates (like Rawlinson) are significant enough to generate enough historical writing to support a dissertation.

As is perhaps evident, I instinctively dislike the first option, and so was left to grapple with the latter two choices. After delving into sample reading for both topics I plumped for the battle/campaign focus, largely due to my dislike of the endless number of biographical works I would be forced to endure by studying the impact of Haig. This left me with one final decision, Somme or Passchendaele? I went with the Somme, as, for various reasons, it has left a significantly bigger historiographical 'footprint', even if it does seem like a somewhat obvious choice. All that remains is to come up with a snazzy title, one that will woo the crowd of historians I am soon to face. Something along the lines of:

'The Battle of the Somme: An Historiographical Investigation in Operational Strategy and Tactics'

or I could just reverse word the damn thing:

Operational Strategy and Tactics at the Somme: A Historiographical Investigation'

I just don't know!

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Careers Events and the Public Sector

Today I attended an hour long presentation given as part of a one day careers event at the University of Leeds under the slightly cheesy title of  'EXPO11'. I generally find these events fairly depressing experiences and I'm glad to say that today was no exception. Most of the advice given at these events is either couched in so much management/HR speak as to be virtually indecipherable into common English, or is simply so generic as to be merely common sense. 

For example, one of the 'expert' point put across by a speaker was that when completing a job application form it is advisable to write a complete answer. Well thanks for that! I was planning on just mashing the keyboard with my fist until I hit the word limit, guess I'll now have to revise my strategy.

Although there were a variety of talks and events available today I could only bare to subject myself to one of them so I elected to attend a 3pm talk being given on applying for careers in the public sector. There where 4 people invited in to speak on this topic, most of them from the local council. What surprised me the most was the lack of any emphasis placed on the key differences on working in a public service career and the for-profit private sector. Indeed, they seemed keen overall to stress the similarities in their style of work! Not once were the virtues public service mentioned, indeed the recent applicants who talked seemed to have simply stumbled into the job as if by accident. There seemed to be a complete obliviousness to the profoundly political nature of their jobs, one lady trumpeted the management of almost total cuts for severely disabled citizens of Leeds as another 'skill' to put on her bloated CV, a mere exercise in technocratic efficiency. Although I am still keen to pursue some sort of public service career, this talk did not instill me with confidence as to the caliber of people I may end up working alongside!

When asked a question about job security in the public sector, something I thought would be a clear benefit to working there, the consensus seemed to be that 2 year contracts were now the norm and this was a good thing as after 2 year any normal person would have mastered their previous role and be looking to move on anyway! I found it truly extraordinary that such limited tenure and security of position could be treated in such a manner. What is in effect a major defeat for public workers and all those interested in working in the profession is now being presented as a victory of dynamism and efficiency, able to maximise the life experiences for all employees involved! Fun times ahead for all concerned no doubt.

As a final point I would just like to mention the giant fucking elephant in the room that seems to rarely crop up at careers events. This is the issue of there being ALMOST NO GRADUATE JOBS OUT THERE WHATSOEVER. One of the pundits today cheerily yelped something today about a 'steadily improving situation' and expressed confidence in all of us finding work. Yeah, well maybe. But it sure doesn't look that way to me! The shitty economic situation really doesn't seem to impact the glossy rhetoric of all these career events, its just as 'blue sky' as it was before, with perhaps an even greater emphasis on cut-throat competition. 

Although all undergraduates and postgraduates are endlessly bombarded with mails and flyers to attended these cursed events I honestly don't recommend them. Spend the time doing something worthwhile, like smashing your face into a pebble-dashed wall or actually getting on and doing some reading!